The Big Fat Lie Exposed by BMJ

British Medical Journal Study Without Vested Interests in Statin Drugs

by Paul Fassa
Health Impact News

The saturated fat lie is officially exposed now that the British Journal of Sports Medicine, a division of the BMJ (British Medical Journal), emphatically declared:

Saturated fat does not clog the arteries: coronary heart disease is a chronic inflammatory condition, the risk of which can be effectively reduced from healthy lifestyle interventions. (Emphasis added)

Of course, the lie may persist for some time. Health Impact News readers and a relative handful of knowledgeable consumers already know this.

Even so, most mainstream and even holistic doctors, nutritionists, and most health writers, orthodox and alternative, still maintain the prevailing false dogma of saturated fat as the villain creating poor heart health. More on that here.

Cholesterol is Essential to Your Body

Some health experts out of the saturated fat dogma box even call cholesterol an innocent bystander trying to help curb inflammation. The importance of cholesterol for overall health has been observed by many over the past decade.

They include the first phase of our skin for transforming sunlight into vitamin D3, building cell walls throughout our bodies, and comprising most of our brains’ structure. Reducing cholesterol artificially with statin drugs often leads to early dementia and other serious side effects. More on that here.

Other sources say the plaque could be formed from excessive calcium intake that doesn’t get into bone-matter because other nutrients that help calcium get into bone-matter are missing. Magnesium, silica, and vitamin K2 are vital for keeping calcium out of the blood where it can collect and form plaque in blood vessels. (Source)

None of this is new to Health Impact News‘ extensive coverage of false fat dogma and promotion. But the BMJ paper disclosed a surprising cardiac inflammatory source: unresolved childhood trauma. Their study determined that:

chronic stress increases glucocorticoid receptor resistance, which results in failure to downregulate the inflammatory response.

For the whole story go to:

I have been saying this for years!

Here’s to your health!

Dr. Anthony Palombo

2 thoughts on “The Big Fat Lie Exposed by BMJ

  1. petetheplan says:

    I love it Anthony — thanks for yet another expose, but the list just gets longer because nobody now remembers where The Big Fat Lie started, and how the world of mankind has remained deceived ever since. I’m sending you a more complete reply and a couple more points towards furthering your exposure of the Jesus Scam.

  2. petetheplan says:

    I’m so grateful for your regular exposure-posts Anthony. Martin before you also used to put himself on-the-line (I thought) with his regular exposure-talks about the Government-of-God and the failed substitute-state of mankind’s rule-by-domination. I mentioned this to a mutual friend, in a caring way, and he said “There is a protective hedge”, which I can relate to now as our angelic-immune-system; may it long protect you too! Do you have any more on: — surprising cardiac inflammatory source: unresolved childhood trauma? I think that would be worth exposing since so many people rely on a compromised childhood background to excuse their on-going stinking behaviour in adult years. The point is, the past is past; you cannot resolve spilt-milk or a broken glass. Get over it and let it be consigned to our ability to forget instead of our memory-bank. I’m always amazed how the sordid disgrace and pain of world-wars is re-vamped annually with flags and poppies in commemoration of the dead; people just don’t seem to appreciate the ability to forget and the permanent privilege we have in remembering who we are and our value to life now.

    Perhaps it can be shown that forgiveness is the only remedy to resolve childhood trauma, and indeed the racial-trauma that sustains war – generation after generation – despite the fact that the cause of war would not be sanctioned by a sane person. War instead is glorified by historians – depending on which side they sit – but flies-in-the-face against any sane mature evaluation of a condition that has escalated from a disagreement between two women, as is the ongoing Arab/Israeli conflict back in Jacob’s day, to costing billions in dollars and lives even today.

    On that note I trust we haven’t seen the last of the Jesus-exposé posts? There is far more mileage to come from revealing the truth of what happened because of the crucifixion and the religious interpretation of that illegal act. In fact the Big Fat Lie goes all the way back to when Earth was still Eden, when the imposter hived off a garden – an ‘improvement’ on the ordained order – which has since infested the globe causing ice-ages, leaving their remnants at the Poles, and still humanity is suckered in to it “Thou shalt not surely die.” But surely they do, and never know why.

    For example, if the crucifixion of Jesus is to be seen as the only means whereby a wrathful god could be cajoled into forgiving humanity’s latent flaw, inherited from Adam’s cloned help-meet Eve, then the prime-mover who enabled the crucifixion was Judas Iscariot. Judas must therefore be reinstated – by the Church – as chief saint according to the way he facilitated the appeasement-plan that God intended to be fulfilled by scriptural treaty. If God’s covenant could only be obtained by the denouncement of Jesus by Judas, then Judas should be acknowledged as head saint.

    This would also confirm the character of those hearsay words supposedly spoken by Jesus — in denunciation of our Father — from the cross, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” If those words were true – which can be proven otherwise – then it would throw a whole new character-interpretation on Jesus, and certainly refute his previous claim, “The Father and I are one.” Instead, we are given a perfect character-example of man, through this one man, made in God’s image and likeness – nothing at all like the dust-of-the-ground, bio-engineered gardener, that blamed the Lord for his misbehaviour, “It was the woman that thou gavest me, she gave me of the fruit.”

    Theology has credited Adam as God’s creation, although the Bible doesn’t say that. However the idea can be seen as foundational to the church-image of Jesus – either as a suckling-babe as the Catholic cult portrays him, with Mary his earth-mother as the divinity-figurine – or as an ‘only-human’ wimp, who, put to the test of torture, would denounce the Father he came to reveal to mankind. That image would surely refute the true words spoken during that time-of-torment, “Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do.” Take your pick; the Jesus of religious fabrication – a scapegoat for Adam’s alleged iniquity — or the true representation of a Son-of-God made in God’s image and likeness? The contrast is beyond question, and should leave no reasonable doubt in any honest person’s mind and heart that the Church has framed Jesus and defiled the holy Name-of-God. I think it would be fitting, in order to clear God’s Name and the role Jesus played towards forwarding the Restoration, to bring the Church leaders to Justice in a criminal court — the Supreme High Court, no less – to answer for blasphemy and political treason practiced by their theology. Trust no man or woman unless you both trust God.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s